PHYSICS-INFORMED MACHINE LEARNING FOR RELIABILITY AND REMAINING USEFUL LIFE PREDICTION OF AEROSPACE SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Nishith Kumar Reddy Gorla, Ph.D.

Keywords:

Physics-informed machine learning, remaining useful life prediction, aerospace reliability, predictive maintenance, prognostics, turbofan engines, fatigue damage, hybrid modeling

Abstract

Aerospace systems demand exceptional reliability standards due to safety-critical operationsand high consequence of failure. Traditional reliability assessment and remaining useful life(RUL) prediction methods rely heavily on either physics-based models requiring extensivecomputational resources or purely data-driven approaches that lack physical interpretability and struggle with limited failure data

References

Annis, C. (2004) 'Probabilistic life prediction isn't as easy as it looks', Journal of ASTM International, 1(4), pp. 1-12.

Goebel, K., Saha, B., Saxena, A., Celaya, J.R. and Christophersen, J.P. (2017) 'Prognostics in battery health management', IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 11(4), pp. 33-40.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Nishith Kumar Reddy Gorla, Ph.D. (2026). PHYSICS-INFORMED MACHINE LEARNING FOR RELIABILITY AND REMAINING USEFUL LIFE PREDICTION OF AEROSPACE SYSTEMS. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 35(2), 11–32. Retrieved from https://www.eudoxuspress.com/index.php/pub/article/view/4854

Issue

Section

Articles